Post by StormInateacup on Jul 1, 2012 15:30:13 GMT -5
An international team of biologists released a report almost 8 years ago, warning that when endangered species become extinct, they take down other dependent species with them. The upshot of the finding is that up to 50 percent more species may be endangered than can be currently accounted for by biologists.
Since the publication of that report the situation has worsened and accelerated greatly.
In the current climate of shrinking research dollars due to the world economic slow down, population pressures leading to further incursions into sensitive wilderness areas and the destruction of native forest areas for such purposes as mining, propagation of bio-fuel and other cash crops, the rate of extinction far exceeds the scientific's community's ability to monitor precisely which species are being wiped out. ...and what the flow-on effects for biodiversity from that will be.
The best estimates are that 6,300 affiliate species are 'co-endangered' with host species currently listed as endangered. The report, published in the journal Science does not seem to have been followed ip to any great extent..
Furthermore, they added that current extinction estimates need to be recalibrated to take co-extinctions into account. I have not been able to access any information which makes it clear that this recommendation has been followed.
The researchers studied insects, mites, fungi and other organisms uniquely adapted to any of the more than 12,000 threatened or endangered species listed worldwide. What they found is that with the extinction of a bird, or a mammal or a plant, you aren't necessarily wiping out just one, single species, says study researcher Heather Proctor. We're also allowing all these unsung dependent species to be wiped out as well.
Proctor cites the example of a formerly endangered vine in Singapore. When the vine went extinct a few years ago, so did a rare and beautiful species of butterfly that had co-evolved with the plant.
While co-extinction may not be the most important cause of species extinctions, it is certainly an insidious and under researched one, the report concludes.
Source: www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/new...3-Sep-2004/story.htm
The endangered California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) and its now extinct louse (Colpocephalum californici). This louse was only known from the California condor and went extinct as a result of efforts by conservation biologists to rid the bird of its parasites.
Hummingbird flower mites can go extinct if either the hummingbirds they use for transport or flowers on which the mites depend for nectar and pollen go extinct. In the illustration, the mite Tropicoseius uniformis, monophagous on its host plant Psychotria poepegiana, is phoretic on the hummingbird Amazilia tobaci in Trinidad, West Indies.
Since the publication of that report the situation has worsened and accelerated greatly.
In the current climate of shrinking research dollars due to the world economic slow down, population pressures leading to further incursions into sensitive wilderness areas and the destruction of native forest areas for such purposes as mining, propagation of bio-fuel and other cash crops, the rate of extinction far exceeds the scientific's community's ability to monitor precisely which species are being wiped out. ...and what the flow-on effects for biodiversity from that will be.
The best estimates are that 6,300 affiliate species are 'co-endangered' with host species currently listed as endangered. The report, published in the journal Science does not seem to have been followed ip to any great extent..
Furthermore, they added that current extinction estimates need to be recalibrated to take co-extinctions into account. I have not been able to access any information which makes it clear that this recommendation has been followed.
The researchers studied insects, mites, fungi and other organisms uniquely adapted to any of the more than 12,000 threatened or endangered species listed worldwide. What they found is that with the extinction of a bird, or a mammal or a plant, you aren't necessarily wiping out just one, single species, says study researcher Heather Proctor. We're also allowing all these unsung dependent species to be wiped out as well.
Proctor cites the example of a formerly endangered vine in Singapore. When the vine went extinct a few years ago, so did a rare and beautiful species of butterfly that had co-evolved with the plant.
While co-extinction may not be the most important cause of species extinctions, it is certainly an insidious and under researched one, the report concludes.
Source: www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/new...3-Sep-2004/story.htm
The endangered California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) and its now extinct louse (Colpocephalum californici). This louse was only known from the California condor and went extinct as a result of efforts by conservation biologists to rid the bird of its parasites.
Hummingbird flower mites can go extinct if either the hummingbirds they use for transport or flowers on which the mites depend for nectar and pollen go extinct. In the illustration, the mite Tropicoseius uniformis, monophagous on its host plant Psychotria poepegiana, is phoretic on the hummingbird Amazilia tobaci in Trinidad, West Indies.