He comes across as quite progressive, politically, and I think America has a kind of pathological aversion to progressive (domestic) politics. It's probably one of the main reasons why the two party dem/rep system has become so stolid and conservative.
Although I can get behind where he's coming from, politically, I think it's a big mistake to mention having "Anarchist tendencies".
That's going to work against him. People (especially American people) don't seem to be able to grasp that anarchy is anything more than social breakdown, and lawlessness. The American Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence are basically Anarchist documents. And the American Constitution is founded along those very lines.
Ever since they proclaimed the Constitution, they've been trying to curb the freedoms it gives American citizens, whilst at the same time, holding it up as a cornerstone of tSociety. That's what happens whenever people try to politicise Anarchy, it gets co-opted, then subverted, often by good men, for the right reasons, but as an ideal, it doesn't lend itself well to party politics. Nor should it. It's not a political ideal. It's a personal one. Which brings me back to Naylor. He understands this, and prudently doesn't describe himself as an "anarchist". That would be political suicide.
But if you can develop a political doctrine, around anarchist principles, without actually mentioning the "A" word, then you really can start to come up with some progressively relevant policies. I think he understands this. And I'm certain that Thomas Paine did.
Your founding Fathers were basically a rag tag bunch of Radicals, Seditionists, and Revolutionaries. Their ideals built America up to be the strong Nation that it is. But today, anyone who espouses these same principles is seen as an enemy of the State. Which, I suppose they would be. But then, your State has become owned by Bankers and Oligarchs.
These people and their institutions are the real enemy. They don't care what flavour politicians do the running of your country, because they own everyone who even gets a sniff at political power.
It's not just America, because most of the Oligarchs at the top are from old, well established European Houses anyway. Rothschilds, Lemans, The Bilderberg group, the Trilateral comittee,
these people buy up whole Blocs of Nations, set them against each other, then consolidate their privileged positions by making sure that they have control of all the resources, all of the time.
And that's just not good enough. Whole Continents of people have been disenfranchised and exploited for so long now, that we think in terms of "First" "Second" and "Third" World Countries. That just re-imposes the whole, sick caste system we've been trying to overcome for the last 15 generations, only on a Global level.
As a major player in the International Political arena, America needs to overcome their aversion to anything "progressive".
Your propensity for innovation and revolutionary political ideas is one of the best things you have going for you as a Nation.
New World thinking is what sets you apart from the rest of the Western World. And yet, your Leaders do their level best to stifle and silence anything that might rock the boat.
Fuck the Boat, I say. Your Ancestors knew when to knock bloody great holes in the bastard, that's why they fought so hard for independence. And with all due respect, all you've done is whored that Independence out, and now she's turning tricks for the same people who drove your ancestors out of Europe. So much for progress.
No one is going to step in and rectify this for you from outside. You kinda burned that boat in 1776. People like Naylor are your best hope for a better tomorrow. Their ideas are the ones you need for any meaningful kind of "New World Order". I actually think Ron Paul has realised this, but he's too old to implement any lasting change now unless he gets the Presidency, and this isn't very likely at the moment.
You've got to resign yourselves to another term of Obama now, this suggests the people at the top are on a kind of hiatus, to see which way the wind is going to blow.
I think it's going to be a restless term coming up. I see social upheaval, secessionism, and de-federalisation being the flavour of the next decade. Not just in America, but Europe too. About time too if you ask me. Hitler's dream of a Federal, Jew free Europe with Germany at the top seems to be foundering with the fall of the Eurozone. But that's a whole other thread.
