Post by alyceavary on Oct 1, 2012 23:28:35 GMT -5
Here in my local paper, we have what are called "Rant & Raves". An issue came up and you KNOW how I love to voice my opinion. So I did. Here's how it went down:
Sept. 24:
First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes the baby in the baby carriage. Did they stop teaching kids this rhyme? This is not how it happens today.
Sept. 26:
I agree with the person about people having children before marriage. It's a shame that people act like it's no big deal. They glorify it and make it seem like it's OK. Many of these children end up with no father figure!
Sept. 28:
My reply: Yes, having a mother and a father is ideal, but what about those situations when a man (or a woman in some cases) is abusive to that child? Or a man has no desire to be in that child's life? How dare you judge me for being a single mom when you have no idea what my situation is. And a father figure doesn't have to be a "father," that could be filled by a grandfather or uncle. Or by two dads or two moms.
Someone else: Don't imply that it's always the woman's fault! Why doesn't "daddy" step up to the plate? If he didn't want children, he should have taken precautions like: vasectomy, abstinence, contraceptives. Take responsibility for your children — pay child support and be part of your children's lives. You helped make 'em so you help support 'em.
Oct. 2:
You single mothers obviously didn’t read! The comment was about how it has become acceptable in today’s society for girls/women to have children out of wedlock. Yes, there are many single mothers out there, myself included, but I was a married adult when I decided to have a baby.
Reply I have submitted (waiting to see if it gets published): I wasn't married when I got pregnant, nowhere near being married and I'm STILL not ay closer. But, there is NOTHING in my religion that says I HAVE to be married first. Not everyone in this area, country, or world has the exact same religion. I am absolutely proud that I don't have to depend on a man to complete me and ecstatic that I didn't marry the guy who got me pregnant because he has NEVER been there for my child or me.
Now, am I being too sensitive on the subject? I know that I tend to jump off the deep end and read too much into things......just wanting outside opinions. BTW, you can read the other submissions and get an idea of what is going on in this area by going to www.valdostadailytimes.com and clicking on Rant & Raves.
Sept. 24:
First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes the baby in the baby carriage. Did they stop teaching kids this rhyme? This is not how it happens today.
Sept. 26:
I agree with the person about people having children before marriage. It's a shame that people act like it's no big deal. They glorify it and make it seem like it's OK. Many of these children end up with no father figure!
Sept. 28:
My reply: Yes, having a mother and a father is ideal, but what about those situations when a man (or a woman in some cases) is abusive to that child? Or a man has no desire to be in that child's life? How dare you judge me for being a single mom when you have no idea what my situation is. And a father figure doesn't have to be a "father," that could be filled by a grandfather or uncle. Or by two dads or two moms.
Someone else: Don't imply that it's always the woman's fault! Why doesn't "daddy" step up to the plate? If he didn't want children, he should have taken precautions like: vasectomy, abstinence, contraceptives. Take responsibility for your children — pay child support and be part of your children's lives. You helped make 'em so you help support 'em.
Oct. 2:
You single mothers obviously didn’t read! The comment was about how it has become acceptable in today’s society for girls/women to have children out of wedlock. Yes, there are many single mothers out there, myself included, but I was a married adult when I decided to have a baby.
Reply I have submitted (waiting to see if it gets published): I wasn't married when I got pregnant, nowhere near being married and I'm STILL not ay closer. But, there is NOTHING in my religion that says I HAVE to be married first. Not everyone in this area, country, or world has the exact same religion. I am absolutely proud that I don't have to depend on a man to complete me and ecstatic that I didn't marry the guy who got me pregnant because he has NEVER been there for my child or me.
Now, am I being too sensitive on the subject? I know that I tend to jump off the deep end and read too much into things......just wanting outside opinions. BTW, you can read the other submissions and get an idea of what is going on in this area by going to www.valdostadailytimes.com and clicking on Rant & Raves.