|
|
Post by ayezatulbrite on Sept 7, 2012 22:20:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by marisol on Sept 7, 2012 22:48:54 GMT -5
Alrighty then....
|
|
|
|
Post by ayezatulbrite on Sept 10, 2012 13:52:30 GMT -5
I do not agree with eevrything Neal Adams says. He "overextends" himself and goes off on certain tangents that are too speculative, which tends to detract from the rest of his arguments / observations. Neither do I agree with everything Steven Novella says. The salient points raised in the video remain almost entirely unrefuted by Steven Novella in thta little piece. I'm sure Steven is a very clever boy with better qualifications than me, but he never addressed the salient points in my opinion. That article was a diversion and a distraction from the main points (in my opinion) raised by Neal Adams. It's like some Prof who wrote a paper "refuting" conspiracy theories on 9/11 that I read (can't remember his name). He didn't really refute anything. He dealt with straw man arguments. He ignored certain key observations. He didn't do a single calculation on the strength of any structural element. He never did a finite element analysis. He never specified modes of failure. I wasn't very impressed by Steven Novella either The article was mostly peripheral, i.e. a lot of fluff! Prof Bazant, that's the treason monkey who wrote a lot of pseudo scientific claptrap about 9/11 just so that he could earn some money and gaurantee status and position. p.s. you can't refute something by not mentioning it! |
|
|
|
Post by marisol on Sept 11, 2012 12:23:01 GMT -5
Ok
|
|
|
|
Post by ayezatulbrite on Sept 11, 2012 20:23:49 GMT -5
|
|
firesong
Lecturer In Regular Oration(Lvl 4)
Posts: 136
|
Post by firesong on Sept 12, 2012 17:33:13 GMT -5
the earth is hollow and has been expanding for 70 million years... FACT... now DEAL with it! the short version Interesting... |
|
|
|
Post by ayezatulbrite on Sept 15, 2012 19:07:50 GMT -5
if you look at the aged strata on the ocean floor, you can see what went where, when it went there and how fast it was going...... not much evidence of subduction!
the new ocean floor has been created in the middle of the ocean floors for about 70 million years
an increase in gravity about 70 million years ago caused extrusion of the magma which is what built most of the ocean floor.... mass is a property of gravity and not the other way round
|
|
|
|
Post by ayezatulbrite on Sept 15, 2012 19:09:19 GMT -5
if you look at the aged strata on the ocean floor, you can see what went where, when it went there and how fast it was going...... not much evidence of subduction! the new ocean floor has been created in the middle of the ocean floors for about 70 million years an increase in gravity about 70 million years ago caused extrusion of the magma which is what built most of the ocean floor.... mass is a property of gravity and not the other way round Steven Novella doesn't debunk any of this because he never mentions it! |
|
|
|
Post by marisol on Sept 16, 2012 0:26:19 GMT -5
ok
|
|
|
|
Post by ayezatulbrite on Sept 16, 2012 14:10:55 GMT -5
I don't know if that's a vindication or merely an acknowledgement? |
|
Shanti
Student Of Verbosity(Lvl 1-2)
I went to the woods to live deliberately.
Posts: 16
|
Post by Shanti on Sept 21, 2012 18:28:16 GMT -5
Its full of hot air and thats why it floats in space.  My not in intellectual mode moment, brought to you by, "Is that a fly in my coffee?".  |
|
